No Brainer
At a coffee shop this afternoon I saw a poster for a talk being held at a local church:
Hmm, let's see. Considering it's a NOVEL, defined by dictionary.com as "A fictional prose narrative of considerable length, typically having a plot that is unfolded by the actions, speech, and thoughts of the characters," I don't know — what do you think?
Jesus Christ, people, give it up already.
To re-cast a self-declared work of fiction as a true document of history for the sole purpose of self-righteously pointing out all of its probable falsehoods is pretty damn pathetic, in my opinion. You know what? That Holden Caulfield clown? He wasn't real, either.
Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code:
Fact or Fiction?
Hmm, let's see. Considering it's a NOVEL, defined by dictionary.com as "A fictional prose narrative of considerable length, typically having a plot that is unfolded by the actions, speech, and thoughts of the characters," I don't know — what do you think?
Jesus Christ, people, give it up already.
To re-cast a self-declared work of fiction as a true document of history for the sole purpose of self-righteously pointing out all of its probable falsehoods is pretty damn pathetic, in my opinion. You know what? That Holden Caulfield clown? He wasn't real, either.